Fall 2020 - Chassis and Aerobody Project Discussion
Introduction
The re-occurring theme of recent terms is that we have had to carry out re-designs on the Chassis because of the uncertainty surrounding the quality of our carbon fibre components that have been initially designated as being structural, i.e. the bottom panel, and A, B, and C bulkheads.
The instinctive solution has been to accept that we would not be able to manufacture carbon fibre components that would meet their required standard and contribution for overall structural integrity of the car. We would then reinforce the Chassis in nearby areas to compensate for the lack of structural integrity.
The latest findings from simulations have concluded that removing the bulkheads would, by a far margin, result in the Chassis not passing regulations. At this stage of the project, we have several options.
Table 1: Options and their pros and cons
Option | Pros | Cons |
Manufacture new bulkheads that meet structural requirements |
|
|
Design the Chassis assuming there are no bulkheads; Add the necessary tubes to pass regulations |
|
|
Assess bulkhead properties and add minimum number of tubes |
|
|
Factors to be considered
Some points are impossible to achieve, e.g. it is close to impossible to improve layup quality in a short notice
People’s bandwidth as we enter the end of the term
Can certain options be pushed to the next term?
WE WOULDN’T BE ABLE TO ADD NEW TUBES AFTER CHASSIS HAS BEEN POWDER COATED