Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Overview

Project team:
Project supervisor(s):
Stakeholders:
JIRA Link:


Objective

Design solution to mount battery box (enclosure) to vehicle


Background

Battery Box Design

Based on prior discussion (2017-01-14 Battery Box Size), the current battery box weight and dimensions can be summarized as follows:

  • We will be using 2 boxes, each housing 18 of the 36 modules
  • Rough Dimensions: 24" x 18" x 5" (L x W x H)
  • Approx weight of 40 kg per box, based on 80 kg estimate for both boxes (see Weight Budget)

Battery Placement in Chassis

*Regarding the pontoon hull, the current proposal would be to split the two battery boxes between the hulls as per above.


Previous Discussion

Previous documentation relating to the Battery Box mounting solution can be found here: Battery Box Mount


Design Considerations

RequirementsConstraints
  • Securely hold battery box in place
  • Fit within chassis dimensions
  • Minimize vibrations
  • Support weight of battery box
  • Allow for easy removal of battery box
  • Compatible with dimensions of battery box
  • Configurable (change placement of battery box in vehicle)

  • Manufacturability

  • Mount to vehicle chassis

*Regarding the configurability of mounting solutions, having this option would allow for better weight distribution depending on the number of battery modules used (per different regulations for maximum battery capacity) by allowing for the repositioning of the battery/batteries in the vehicle. This would also be the case for adjusting when racing with a driver + passenger vs. driver only.


Sub-Functions

Based on the above requirements and constraints, the function of the battery box mounting system can be broken down into the following sub-functions:

  1. Guide system (what will actually hold battery box, provide support in "x","y" direction)
  2. Mounting to chassis
  3. Locking mechanism (what will secure box in place, support in "z" direction)
  4. Vibration dampening


Design Selection & Analysis

Solutions to these sub-functions can be analyzed in a morphological chart:


Morphological Chart

Sub-FunctionOption 1Option 2Option 3Option 4Option 5Option 6
Guide System

Tracks

(low friction)

Tracks (wheels)Enclosure (box)Enclosure (skeletonized)

Enclosure

(C-channel)

Webbing
Mount to ChassisWeldBolt IntoFasten AroundAdhesive

Locking MechanismPinStrapsArmRatchet

Vibration DampeningFoamSpringsTight fitting guideTightening guide


Proposed Solutions

DesignSub-function SolutionsSketch
Option A (Datum)
  • C-channel
  • Welded mounting points to chassis
  • Secured by tightening arm
  • Vibration further dampened with foam

Option B

Option C

Selection

The above proposed solutions can then be ranked based on the following criteria. The ranking scheme used will compare designs against a datum design (Option A) ranking them with either: +1 (better), -1 (worse), or 0 (equal). 

Ranking Criteria:

  • Securely hold battery box in place
  • Robustness
  • Easy removal of battery box
  • Minimize vibrations
  • Configurability
  • Manufacturability
  • Securely mount to chassis

Design Selection Chart

CriteriaOption A (Datum)Option BOption C

+0


+0


+0


+0


+0


+0

Total0

Discussion

Believe that Design ______ is best because of _____________

Some issues that still need to be addressed are ____________ which can be further addressed by doing __________ to this design

All in all, we believe that this design is the best possible option for mounting the battery box to the vehicle chassis based on the aforementioned requirements and constraints.


Moving Forward

  • No labels