Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

This page contains the findings for conducting FEA on the steering arm.

Loading conditions: (from this Google Sheet) 

Vy = 1054.575 N

Mx = 54.8379 Nm

My = 147.6405 Nm

Mz = 173.5619535 Nm


DateMax Stress and locationMax displacement and locationWhat I learnedQuestions after doing the analysis
11/04/19

  • FEA SEEMS TO BE LINING UP WITH MY CALCS! In the right range!
  • Sharp corners are likely to have the highest stresses. This was also observed by fixing the hole surface of the rod end hole; the pointed edge of the hole had the highest stress in that case.
  • Filleting seems to be good
  • Bend doesn’t affect it a lot
  • The mesh doesn’t need to be crazy small
  • It’s okay if it’s not like the previous steering arm, since our loading case is different
  • Why are our loading conditions so different from MSXII’s?
  • What happens when you make it thinner and taller? This increases moment of inertia; is it better for torsion? Test this tomorrow
  • How does it work without any fillets? Test this tomorrow
11/05/19

  • Making the arm thinner was an okay idea
  • Refining mesh made results more predictable
  • Filleting isn't crucial
  • Our culprit is not the rod end hole, but the steering bracket hole
  • Can we add weight reduction slots? Is it better on the top, bottom, left, or right sides?
  • Should the wall thickness change around the steering bracket hole? Maybe the shape shouldn't be so rectangular there? Look into other shapes.





  • No labels