Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 4
Next »
š Meeting minutes
Date | Attendees | Agenda | Notes, decisions and action items |
---|
July 1 | Adrian Au SJ (Unlicensed) Micah Black Kristen Emiko Shiozaki (Deactivated) Michael Shiozaki Micah Bai | Array Panel Hinging | Hinge design project was assigned today Initial thought was charging configuration would be sideways (side hinges) Assuming the panels have to stay on the car at some capacity, can we facilitate rotation for the trunk panel given what weāre hoping for our current trunk functionality (which is to act like a normal trunk) How important is angled incidence in the overall big picture (does it give us a 0.5% boost in overall day charging?) Should do the math to determine the significance In terms of high-level strategy, what are the aero / dynamic tradeoffs due to side hinges (if any)?
2 options being considered From a feasibility standpoint - the fewer hinges you have to make (especially consistency), the better From a pure geometry standpoint, rear/trunk panel will want to hinge inwards vs. on the sides due to the hinge location being on a flat part vs. a curved part if it were hinged on the sides What is easier to design? Adrian recommends not following Minessotaās route - aka no hinges Space for trunk hinges - would it be wide enough for the trunk panel to open trunk style? Charging configurations are only practical if you have allocated charging times Ideal choice: remove trunk + roof panels for charging Rope Clarke + strategy in to learn about their charging models Are there any
|
Array Panel Cutouts | Rough plan was to drill 3/4ā holes where the terminals are such that the tabs poke through and solder through those Interiors would like to cover wires - donāt want to see any inside the car Goal for MPPT is to have all wires in 1 box Would be good to have hole placements in CAD
|
July 22 | Adrian Au Leif Blake Geoffrey Liu Micah Bai Kristen Emiko Shiozaki (Deactivated) | Brake routing between front and rear wheels | Concerns Where are we putting the cables How are we pulling the parking brake What mechanism fits best with our limited space (Adrianās recommendation was a pedal style) Cable routing - will it interfere with other systems?
Old Routing Why a Pedal Mount? Positioning? What to sort out Can we have a 3d printed part that the brake lines go through? Adhesives would be weak and cannot resist the pulling of the cable If weāre thinking of coming through a hole in the upright, the wheel wll turn a bit, but the push-rod does not turn and itās hard to say how the cable will go through there The bend radius of the cable kind follows the shape and goes around, but itās hard to control the āmotionā of the cable (might be unable to prevent potential rubbing of the wheel) For the actual brakes, might be better to come around the aerobody - current routing is going through a mess of components
Next Steps Routing through the chassis then work through components (mount to firewall, etc.) For brake route cabling going to the rear wheels - main ideal was to keep it in the bottom corner of the catamaran (by the driverās right leg) Might not need to go through the front firewall but will need to go through the rear firewall For the front, cable routing should be similar Understand what you can and canāt do from the Dynamics end (Geoffrey Liu to schedule another meeting w/ Leif) Focus on routing first
|