Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
Version 1
Next »
đź“ť Meeting minutes
Date | Attendees | Agenda | Notes, decisions and action items |
---|
June 3 | Adrian Au SJ (Unlicensed) Micah Black Kristen Emiko Shiozaki (Deactivated) Michael Shiozaki Micah Bai | Array Panel Hinging | Hinge design project was assigned today Initial thought was charging configuration would be sideways (side hinges) Assuming the panels have to stay on the car at some capacity, can we facilitate rotation for the trunk panel given what we’re hoping for our current trunk functionality (which is to act like a normal trunk) How important is angled incidence in the overall big picture (does it give us a 0.5% boost in overall day charging?) Should do the math to determine the significance In terms of high-level strategy, what are the aero / dynamic tradeoffs due to side hinges (if any)?
2 options being considered From a feasibility standpoint - the fewer hinges you have to make (especially consistency), the better From a pure geometry standpoint, rear/trunk panel will want to hinge inwards vs. on the sides due to the hinge location being on a flat part vs. a curved part if it were hinged on the sides What is easier to design? Adrian recommends not following Minessota’s route - aka no hinges Space for trunk hinges - would it be wide enough for the trunk panel to open trunk style? Charging configurations are only practical if you have allocated charging times Ideal choice: remove trunk + roof panels for charging Rope Clarke + strategy in to learn about their charging models Are there any
|
Array Panel Cutouts | Rough plan was to drill 3/4” holes where the terminals are such that the tabs poke through and solder through those Interiors would like to cover wires - don’t want to see any inside the car Goal for MPPT is to have all wires in 1 box Would be good to have hole placements in CAD
|
| |