...
Expand |
---|
The Google Doc linked below contains all the following content for this section. This was done as doing it within Confluence’s built-in word processing was getting messy and unorganized. Google drive docs |
---|
width | 720 |
---|
showLink | true |
---|
url | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CCwGOWY7R8nmJOKmoRsVYOPtctsRLJMWH11a8YYiBiw/edit?usp=sharing |
---|
height | 960 |
---|
|
Single Sliding Bar Mechanism Image Removed- Instead of having a mechanism that is placed within the car even when the roof is closed, an “add-on” roof prop mechanism was chosen
Logic for above decision is as follows: Roof would/should never open while car is travelling, thus there does not need to be a roof prop mechanism that is integrated within the roof/chassis An “add-on” roof prop mechanism can achieve the same goal (propping up the roof when the car is stationary) while avoiding the limited space issue
The following will now cover the concepting and researching behind the specified architecture of this “add-on” roof prop mechanism: Note: For clarity the the areas highlighted in red and yellow are the potential Roof Hinge mounting areas, while the areas highlighted in blue and green are the potential areas where the Prop Mount (to the chassis) could be located Image RemovedBecause the B-Panel bulkhead does not extend to the top of the chassis, some ideas for the Roof Hinge will require an additional panel (made of an appropriate material) to be attached to the chassis tubes for the highlighted area in Red For the same reason as above (B-Panel bulkhead not extending to the top) some ideas for the Prop to Chassis mount will require an additional panel to be attached to the chassis tubes for the highlighted area in Green This will be denoted in the title of the idea |
Roof Hinge It is important to note that the top of the roof panel will be flush with the tops/edges of the side panels Thus, any hinge design considered must be able to lift the roof panel to be cleared/above the side panels. (i.e. the roof panel does not collide/interfere with the side panels during opening and closing) Four Bar Multi-point Hinge Pop up Hinge (requires additional panel) Four Bar Hinge (requires additional panel) |
Roof Prop
Two types of roof props will exist: fixed length or variable length
Fixed length roof props will be:
Variable length roof props will be:
More flexible
Allowing for the angle of the roof to be variable
Roof solar array will be more efficient at a wider variety of angles
Will take up less storage space within the car
Will likely be heavier
Fixed length:
Variable Length:
Internal CAM Lock
A cam is attached to the inner rod, it is shaped such that when the inner rod is twisted a certain number of degrees, it will push out on a set of plastic/metal halves
These plastic/metal halves contact the outer rod
- Image RemovedImage Removed
Assembly of this may be quite complicated
Ensuring plastic/metal halves are positioned properly
Needing to ensure cam is mounted/positioned properly
May be more efficient to purchase this item
Quite user friendly
NOTE: This may be require additional features to be compatible with some of the mounting methods discussed below
Prop Mounting
The roof prop will need to be mounted to both the roof and chassis of the car in order to properly support the roof
It is also important to note that as the roof prop may need to be removed, the mounting hardware should allow for this as well
Roof Mount:
Chassis Mount:
Hook to Chassis Tube
A hook on the end of the prop would rest directly on the chassis bar in the previously mentioned blue highlighted area
- Image Removed
No additional mounting hardware needed, so this theoretically simplifies manufacturing process
However, will need to manufacture a hook/integrate a purchased solution such that it will be in this orientation
Hook and Pin
General concept remains the same as how it is applied in the roof mounting scenario
Due to the geometry in the mounting area, a pin would potentially be press-fit into a block which would then be adhered onto the bulkhead panel (see below)
- Image Removed
This concept requires more mounting hardware
In addition the concern with how to press-fit the pin/dowel remains
May be easier to integrate the end piece (hook) onto a rod than the “Hook to Chassis Tube” method
The following will now cover the concepting and researching behind the specified architecture of this “add-on” roof prop mechanism:
See video below for clarification
Trunk Double Prop Prototype.wmvNote: For clarity the the areas highlighted in red are where the roof props could potentially be mounted on the B Panel Bulkhead
Image RemovedThe concepts for mounting (to the roof and to the chassis) remain the same from the previous architecture discussed
The concepts for an adjustable length prop also remain the same from previously discussed architecture
Pros of this architecture:
No hinge design is required, this simplifies both the operation and manufacturing
This would be an entirely closed system, and would not require the prop to be removable
Roof could be opened while remaining within the vehicle
Cons of this architecture:
The “hinge replacement” prop must be restricted from rotating
May be issues with ensuring the roof’s motion is purely vertical in the beginning stages
Will need to create an enclosure for the props so that the occupants will not come into contact with them in the event of an impact
The mounts to the chassis will need to have flanges long enough such that the prop will not interfere with the motion of the roof
Selected Concepts
Trunk
Expand |
---|
- Selected concept based on further research and feasibility analysis: Compressed air struts
Main reasons: Ease of use Ease of implementation Manufacturing time
Ease of Use (1) Based on the research done in the previous section, it was evident that the user interaction would be much easier and streamlined with the compressed air struts compared to the 2 bar linkage system. Compressed Air Strut: Opening the trunk: User unlocks trunk latch and lifts trunk. Compressed air struts prop trunk and keep it open (no user interaction needed beyond lifting of trunk) Closing of trunk: User pulls down to close trunk panel, locks trunk latch
2 Bar Linkage System: Opening the trunk: User unlocks trunk latch and must lift trunk for entirety of its range of motion. User then needs to slightly lower the trunk to engage the “Bird’s Mouth” Lock Closing the trunk: User needs to raise the trunk panel slightly to disengage the “Bird’s Mouth” Lock. User then pulls down to close trunk panel, locks trunk latch
2 Bar linkage system’s process is: lengthy, not intuitive and cumbersome Ease of Implementation (2) As can be seen in the previous section, there were notable concerns with the 2 bar linkage system. 2 Bar Linkage system - Locking (to keep Trunk open): 2 Bar Linkage system - Unlocking (to close Trunk): 2 Bar Linkage system - Summary: Compressed Air strut - Summary: “Back of the envelope” calculations verified struts could keep the trunk open (official calculations can be seen in the Detailed Design phase) “Back of the envelope” calculations verified users could easily close trunk Overall more confident that it can work as intended as opposed to 2 Bar Linkage system which still had major uncertainties
Manufacturing Time (3) 2 Bar Linkage system: Compressed Air strut: Would not need to be manufactured Frees up manufacturing resources Was reasonably priced (approximately $63.00 CAD for a set of two from McMaster-Carr)
|
...