Trunk and Roof Props
- Asher L
This page is dedicated to the design process of the trunk and roof props for MSXIV. Included will be progress from the research, concepting, design and manufacturing stages of the project.
Research and Concepts
Trunk
2 BAR LINKAGE SYSTEM
Link to a gif showing a similar system: https://gifs.com/gif/r83AgW
Pros:
Relatively simple mechanism
Two rods connected by an internal pin. At the end points are mounted to external pins
To lock the two linkages a variety of systems may be used:
Name | Image/GIF/Link to Video | Description / Notes |
---|
Name | Image/GIF/Link to Video | Description / Notes |
---|---|---|
“Bird’s mouth” Lock | When opening, will have to raise the roof then slightly lower it to engage the “Bird’s mouth” lock Machining the linkages to have the flanges needed for the lock may be difficult
| |
Spring Loaded Latch |
| In some versions of this type of mechanism it is quite difficult to get the pin past the spring loaded latch Integrating the pin may be difficult Will have to correctly spec out / design spring loaded latch Note: A video of a similar mechanism is linked to in the “Sliding Bar Mechanism” section |
Physical Latch |
| Integrating pin/dowel may be difficult Will need to design / spec out a latch that can withstand necessary force |
ARCHIVE - Intermediate brace | To lock it in place an intermediate brace piece can sit under the internal pin connection (as shown in sketch below) |
Less mounting space required compared to other concepts
Only need two mounting areas for the external pin connection (one on the trunk, the other on the side panel)
Cons:
Can only lock at one height
Will need additional components to have a supported closing of the trunk
i.e. in its current form you must manually close the trunk to prevent it from slamming
SINGLE SLIDING BAR MECHANISM
A single bar is mounted to two external mounting pins
One is on the trunk
The other is mounted to a shaft that it can slide along or may be a pin restricted in its motion by a slide opening
If a pin and slide opening is used, the following mechanism could be used to lock the mechanism
Link: https://youtu.be/5JQkzjj_cxs?t=65 (watch until 1:34)
Notes:
In some versions of this type of mechanism it is quite difficult to get the pin past the spring loaded latch
This mechanism will require additional mounting space and hardware
Integrating the pin may be difficult
Will have to correctly spec out / design spring loaded latch
Pros:
Relatively simple in nature
Only requires shaft, single linkage and external pin mounts
Allows for locking at variable heights
Could (relatively) easily integrate a supported closing mechanism
At the very end of the shaft would need something to slow the velocity of the bottom mount
Adaptable
Allows for the ability to become a motorized system
Can just as easily work as a manual system
Cons:
Will need lots of longitudinal room for the shaft
May weigh more than other designs due to the shaft
COMPRESSED AIR SUPPORT STRUT
Similar mechanism to conventional cars
Will work in a similar manner
Two attachment points, one on the trunk another on the side
When opening the piston will extend
At apex the compressed air supports the piston, preventing it from contracting and the trunk closing
When closing, the force you exert will be greater than what the compressed air within can resist
Causing the piston to contract and the trunk to close
Pros:
Allows for supported closing of the trunk
May be more lightweight compared to other solutions
Cons:
Probably will need to purchase this
May be hard to find one that has the exact specifications we need
If we get ones that are too highly overspecced, it will take a higher than normal amount of force to close the trunk
May be hard to integrate these factory components (which are designed for specific makes and models of production cars) into our custom car
Mounting may be an issue
ARCHIVE - SCISSOR JACK MECHANISM
Top of scissor jack will mount to roof, bottom of scissor jack will mount to side panel
Will work as conventional scissor jacks do
Threaded bar is spun
Clockwise or counterclockwise spin will cause jack to raise or lower
Pros:
Can have automatic opening and closing of trunk (if a motor is used)
Users do not need to physically open the trunk
Can support the roof at a variable angle
Cons:
If a motor is used, this is another element that will draw power from the battery box
Also will add additional weight (on top of the scissor jack itself)
Will require power and control wire connections
Would be hard to integrate a manual operation of the scissor jack
Physically moving the motor’s axle may cause grinding of internal motor gears
If no motor is used (manual operation only) this would be physically strenuous
Will need longitudinal space for the threaded bar to extend into
Roof
SINGLE SLIDING BAR MECHANISM
Similar to the one described for the Trunk
However could use the existing chassis tubes as the shaft
University of Michigan’s roof tilting mechanism is similar to this
2 BAR LINKAGE SYSTEM
Similar to one described for the Trunk
Could have second mounting point on the existing chassis tubes
Feasibility Analysis and Further Research
Trunk
2 Bar Linkage Mechanism with “Bird’s Mouth” Lock
Bird’s Mouth Lock system shown in research section above can be simplified down
Simplified version utilizes only a flange to keep the two bars from rotating (thus locking them in place and propping the trunk)
Above image shows an exploded view of the simplified mechanism
Below is a video of the theoretical motion of the system
NOTE: GRAVITY IS NOT SIMULATED IN THE VIDEO SHOWN - THIS MAY AFFECT THE FINAL MOTION OF THE SYSTEM
Considerations:
When locking (i.e. pushing down on the top linkage to engage with the flange), steps must be taken so the linkage translates diagonally down (as opposed to rotating about its mounting point) so that it properly engages the flange
To do so: the rotation point could be tightly secured
When closing, the two linkages should fold into each other, we are assuming gravity will pull the bottom linkage down and thus provide this motion but this is an assumption
Compressed Air Support Strut
Considerations
Generally support struts are used in pairs
This will result in even distribution of force (as both sides of whatever item is being supported are receiving the force exerted by the support struts)
When the trunk is in the open position, the compressed air struts will be exerting a force greater than the force from the mass of the trunk
Must consider if this will potentially damage solar cells
We know pressure should not be exerted onto the solar cells from the top - but could pressure from the bottom be an issue?
Purchasing Link | Rated Force | Compressed Length | Extended Length | Price | Notes |
---|
Purchasing Link | Rated Force | Compressed Length | Extended Length | Price | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.mcmaster.com/gas-struts/gas-springs-7/extension-force~range~~-11682713872416/ | Smallest: 66N | 128.016mm - 300.99mm (centre to centre) | 178.054mm - 511.048mm (centre to centre) | $25.19 (converted from USD) (potential shipping costs not included | Note: This encompasses a wide selection of gas struts This is a link to their American website Note: These do not include mounts, but they include a ball stud so making the ball socket is not necessary
|
45N (each) 90N (for set of 2) | 165mm (Centre to Centre) | 250mm (Centre to Centre) | $63.99 ($22.31 for shipping) | Comes in a set of two | |
45N (each) 90N (for set of 2) | 165mm (Centre to Centre) | 250mm (Centre to Centre) | $39.99 ($6.85 for shipping) | Comes in set of two No reviews | |
40N
| Through calculation based on drawing: 171mm (End to End) | 247mm (Centre to Centre) 269mm (End to End) | $35.60 CAD | These are not soft close - only soft open Some reviews mention metal mounts are starting to buckle -Could purchase the struts but make our own mounts -Gas struts have ball and socket mounting system (will be hard to produce the ball mount) -May have to just reinforce existing mounts | |
45N (each) | 304.8mm (did not specify whether or not it was centre to centre or end to end) | 508mm (did not specify whether or not it was centre to centre or end to end) | $33.86 ($9.99 for shipping) Set of 2 costs $39.97 (only costs $6.11 more?) | DOES NOT COME WITH MOUNTS -would have to purchase our own Compatible with 10mm ball socket |
Preliminary Motion Analysis
Conducted using McMaster-Carr gas strut (12.2” extended length, 8.26” compressed length), with placeholder trunk and side panels
Note: This initial test was done with a flat trunk panel placeholder, the actual trunk panel is not flat
Early results:
Gas struts can be mounted within our vehicle architecture and still produce desired results
Note: The compressed air strut should be PARALLEL to the trunk in the closed position. This should be done so that when the trunk is unlocked it does not immediately open (because force of the strut will be acting parallel to the trunk)
This will avoid any potential accidents where the trunk is unlocked while there is an obstruction above the trunk and hits it while opening - which would result in serious damage to the solar cells
Unconventional Mounting (if needed)
If the the mounting point of the trunk is not in line with the rotation point of the trunk (unlike how it is in the test above) the strut must be slightly extended when the trunk is closed
This will allow for the necessary slight compression of the strut when the trunk first opens up
The circle represents the path of the mounting point. When the trunk first opens up, it will travel up and away from the pivot point, thus requiring the strut to compress
Also note how the strut is slightly extended when the trunk is in its closed position (as described previously)
Roof
The Google Doc linked below contains all the following content for this section. This was done as doing it within Confluence’s built-in word processing was getting messy and unorganized.
Selected Concepts
Trunk
- Selected concept based on further research and feasibility analysis: Compressed air struts
Main reasons:
Ease of use
Ease of implementation
Manufacturing time
Ease of Use (1)
Based on the research done in the previous section, it was evident that the user interaction would be much easier and streamlined with the compressed air struts compared to the 2 bar linkage system.
Compressed Air Strut:
Opening the trunk: User unlocks trunk latch and lifts trunk. Compressed air struts prop trunk and keep it open (no user interaction needed beyond lifting of trunk)
Closing of trunk: User pulls down to close trunk panel, locks trunk latch
2 Bar Linkage System:
Opening the trunk: User unlocks trunk latch and must lift trunk for entirety of its range of motion. User then needs to slightly lower the trunk to engage the “Bird’s Mouth” Lock
Closing the trunk: User needs to raise the trunk panel slightly to disengage the “Bird’s Mouth” Lock. User then pulls down to close trunk panel, locks trunk latch
2 Bar linkage system’s process is: lengthy, not intuitive and cumbersome
Ease of Implementation (2)
As can be seen in the previous section, there were notable concerns with the 2 bar linkage system.
2 Bar Linkage system - Locking (to keep Trunk open):
Basic assembly did not account for gravity. Therefore hard to verify if the “Bird’s Mouth” Lock could easily be engaged.
There were some cases where the top bar may not translate diagonally and could instead rotate. This would not properly engage the “Bird’s Mouth” lock
In the end more testing would be required
2 Bar Linkage system - Unlocking (to close Trunk):
Basic assembly did not account for gravity. Hard to verify if gravity would pull bottom bar down and for the entire assembly to fold into itself (like how it was shown in the video)
Again more testing would be required if this would happen in real life
2 Bar Linkage system - Summary:
Need to conduct more testing, making design process longer
Could use SolidWorks motion study to account for gravity
But the slot mate used to connect top and bottom bars was not compatible with motion study
Could build scaled down model
Compressed Air strut - Summary:
“Back of the envelope” calculations verified struts could keep the trunk open (official calculations can be seen in the Detailed Design phase)
To be safe, each one of the struts can keep the trunk open
Therefore even if one fails, the other will be enough to ensure trunk stays open
“Back of the envelope” calculations verified users could easily close trunk
In accordance with OSHA guidelines for allowable pulling forces one can exert
For pulling motions above the shoulder level, the maximum allowable force is 540N
Overall more confident that it can work as intended as opposed to 2 Bar Linkage system which still had major uncertainties
Manufacturing Time (3)
2 Bar Linkage system:
Simple geometry but would still require manufacturing and assembly time
Would also take up manufacturing resources
Regardless of if we do it in-house or outsource it, it is a manufacturing resource that is being used
Compressed Air strut:
Would not need to be manufactured
Only the mounts need to be manufactured
But those need to be manufactured for 2 Bar Linkage system as well
Frees up manufacturing resources
Was reasonably priced (approximately $63.00 CAD for a set of two from McMaster-Carr)
Therefore price was not an issue
Roof
Preliminary Design
Trunk
Detailed Design
Trunk