Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Page to document the meetings that were held.

Types of Meetings:

  • Project Planning

  • Updates

  • Training Session

  • Working Session

  • Decision-making

Format:

  • [Type of Meeting]_[YYYY.MM.DD]_[Meeting Description]

Terms:

  • DRI - Directly Responsible Individual

Training Session_2021.05.06_Project Breakdown, Timelining, Member Training

 Click here to expand...

Meeting Agenda/Goals:

  • Have a context debrief and history debrief of Structural FEA project

  • Describing and detailing out (documenting) each project stage.

    • Note: Work together to document details; make members the DRI for documentation for their respective project stage

  • Understanding dependencies/blockers and setting short term timelines/goals

    • Note: we primarily need to prioritize reviewing past work (e.g. MS12) and re-evaluating our current assumptions/FEA setup to see if it is the most appropriate approach.
      Note: ASC Regs are our rules and constraints to design by.

  • Train members on existing Ansys Structural FEA procedures

    • Note: try to highlight areas of uncertainty and improvements
      Note to Self: Mechanical Bay Computers Remote Desktop and Signup Procedures

Meeting Notes:

Context Debrief

  • When and how Structural FEA was done in the past (by Jason and mentored by Matt)

    • assumptions that had to be made, e.g. dynamics weight and mounting - 100 kg on A plane and 100 kg on C plane

    • force model setup/assumptions, i.e. weight relevance when car is off the ground, how we are assuming/representing the vehicle collision scenario in simulation

Describing and detailing each project stage:

  • Notes were made in each project stage’s confluence page

Understanding dependencies/blockers and setting short term timelines/goals

  • No labels