Center of Gravity Calculation Documentation
Center of Gravity Calculation Documentation
Where is optimal placement for CG?
For formula 1 cars, CG is as close to ground as possible and between the wheels
Rear wheel drive is best for performance in racing
Lower center of gravity reduces weight transfer during braking and cornering
Optimal placement: close to the ground, between the wheels
Where can we put objects in car to optimize CG
Engine (https://www.leithcars.com/blogs/1421/lifestyle/front-vs-mid-vs-rear-engines/)
Front-engines are located on or in front of front axle
Most cars are Front wheel drive, so it puts more traction on the wheels controlling the car
Prone to understeering due to loss of traction while accelerating
Makes it bad for racing (lol)
In the case of rear wheel drive, weight is more evenly distributed
Less prone to oversteer compared to rear engine/RWD
Less prone to understeer of front engine/RWD
Worse than low center of gravity mid-engine
Rear-engines are located behind the rear axle
Higher learning curve (?)
Really good for race cars
Quick acceleration from back wheels
Prone to oversteer, but with right tuning can make really good racing cars
Mid-engine sits in front of rear axle and behind driver
Offers better handling by centralizing center of gravity
Front engine is front heavy, back engine is back heavy
Lack of cabin space
I don’t see this being as issue as there’s only 1 person in MSXV
Will be harder to overcome a loss of control due to low center of graviy
Size
Motor:
262mm radius 73mm length
Controller:
203 x 213 x 93.5mm
Weight
Motor:
11kg
Controller:
3.5kg
Battery box
Size
90 x 24 x10cm
Weight
19.4 kg
My personal thoughts
Keep everything generally low
Put the battery box along the bottom of the car
I assume this might be the heaviest component, so keeping it low is a plus
I can understand if it needs to be close to the solar array
Tesla does this
Place the motor between the driver seat and the back axle
This will help centralize center of gravity
Rear wheel drive is better for racing as well
Might also consider FWD for the maneuverability for the figure 8 challenge