Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Simulations on two different composite stack ups, figuring out the best material (unidirectional vs weave) for the catamaran.

Stackup 1

  1. Unidirectional Prepreg (230 GPa) 0 degrees
  2. Unidirectional Prepreg (230 GPa) 90 degrees
  3. 5/8" Honeycomb Core
  4. Unidirectional Prepreg (230 GPa) 90 degrees
  5. Unidirectional Prepreg (230 GPa) 0 degrees

Stackup 2

  1. Weave Prepreg (230 GPa) 0 degrees
  2. Weave Prepreg (230 GPa) 45 degrees
  3. 5/8" Honeycomb Core
  4. Weave Prepreg (230 GPa) 45 degrees
  5. Weave Prepreg (230 GPa) 0 degrees

Note: 0 degrees is the path from left to right on the catamaran

Workbench Setup

Static Structural Setup

  1. Fixed point at the center of the catamaran
  2. 10000N of downwards force on the front driver side corner and the rear passenger side corner
  3. 10000N of upwards force on rear driver side corner and the front passenger side corner


Here are the results (The colors correspond to different values in stackup 1 vs stackup 2)

Stackup 1

  1. Unidirectional Prepreg 0 degrees
  2. Unidirectional Prepreg 90 degrees
  3. 5/8" Honeycomb Core
  4. Unidirectional Prepreg 90 degrees
  5. Unidirectional Prepreg 0 degrees



Stackup 2

  1. Weave Prepreg 0 degrees
  2. Weave Prepreg 45 degrees
  3. 5/8" Honeycomb Core
  4. Weave Prepreg 45 degrees
  5. Weave Prepreg 0 degrees


My initial analysis:

  • The unidirectional has less stress on the sides
  • Stress seems to be better distributed on the front and back panels with the weave




  • No labels