Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

`Motivation:

We need data on the best canopy shape for MS16

Task Description:

Experiment with different Canopy designs in SolidWorks and validate these designs using SimScale.

Requirements/goals:

  1. Length/Width/Height/Point of max frontal area should be kept constant across different canopy shapes.

  2. CFD sim conditions must be kept constant across different iterations.

Fixed dimensions:

Canopy Length: 1.85m

Canopy Height: 0.35m

Canopy Width: 0.6m

Point of max width and height (max frontal area): 900-1100 m from the front of the canopy

15mm fillet radius on the back

CFD conditions:

Minimum Box Values

Maximum Box Values

X min: 0

X max: 5m

Y min: 0

Y max: 4m

Z min: -15

Z max: 7.5

Boundary conditions:

  • Slip wall on top and outer side faces

  • No-slip wall on bottom face

  • Symmetry on inner side face

  • Pressure outlet on rear face

  • Velocity inlet on front face @ -20 m/s

Resultant CD (of the benchmark sim): 0.07, total drag force: 1.32 N

Strategy:

Refer to previous canopy shape research for inspirations on your designs.

https://uwmidsun.atlassian.net/wiki/x/PICOsQ

Canopy design log:

Version

Pictures

Descriptions/Notes

Sim Results

Can 1 (Ryan)

FA = 1.5m^2

Initial/base draft (Ryan)

Cd = 0.0612

Fd = 1.098

Bullet v1 (Gavin)

image-20250122-011307.png

FA = 1.458 m^2

Initial Bullet design

  • Bullet style does not perform as well as Teardrop

Cd = 0.0701

Fd = 1.222

Can 2 (Ryan)

FA = 1.47m^2

Shrank down front (this was a mistake don’t do that)

Shrank down tail on the side profile

Cd = 0.0706

Fd = 1.266

  • Consider Manufacturability

  • No labels