Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Space to store meeting notes for exteriors

Date

Notes

To-do

09/24/2024

Must haves for MS16:

  • Length of 5.5-5.8

  • Is maximizing length optimal?

    • Reduces pressure drag, increases friction drag

  • Adjust split line between aerobody tub and roof

    • No negative draft

    • Split line at vertical part of the aerobody

  • Canopy

    • Cut line changed

      • Needs to “flatten out”

Exteriors goals for MS16:

  • Nose

    • Do not bring it up, keep it lower

      • Easier to manufacture

      • Not as much camber on the roof

      • Space for battery/other systems in the nose now?

  • Bring Point where roof “hangs over” tub more towards the front

  • Split line needs to be at a point where the roof and tub profiles are vertical

  • Ensure tail is not “flimsy”

  • Canopy

    • Increase canopy length

      • length/height ratio as close to 6 as possible

  • Tail

    • Don’t come to a point, come to a box instead to fit license plate

    • Back panel in the layup with the tub

Research to be done:

  • Teardrop vs straight side-edge bottom profile?

  • Optimal CD/frontal area ratio

  • Friction drag vs. pressure drag (what has the bigger effect in our situation)

10/01/2024

  • Canopy

    • Task Idea: Parametric Model

      • Can eventually be extended to be a parametric model for the whole aerobody

      • Can be given to any members who have done onboarding

  • Friction vs Separation Drag:

    • In general, pressure drag should be the dominant drag component over friction drag [Goro Tamai: The Leading Edge].

    • On a solar car where pressure drag should be less noticeable, friction drag is more prevalent.

  • dynamic wheel cover task doc complete

    • review in meeting

  • No labels