Circular Tube vs. Square
- Round tubing is stiffer in torsion while square provides a stiffer beam
- Square tubing is easier to fabricate (no ‘fishmouth’ joints) but the tube distorts under load by ‘lozenging’ or ‘panting’.This adds to compliance and may lead to fatigue cracking.
- Round tubing is best option, and does not need as much design justification. Harder to manufacture, but will lead to less design and strength issues
- May want to consider square tubing for horizontal frame members to simplify suspension mounting points and makes cutting planar joints easier
- Triangulation/reinforcement in square tubing can greatly improve structural integrity
Design Notes:
- To improve manufacturability: design chassis to be "self-jigging"
- Constructed in separate parts which are then joined together
Choosing a Grade of Steel
Summary: Comes down to weight savings vs. cost and manufacturability. Chromoly provides more weight savings, but is more expensive and harder to fabricate
4130 Chromoly | Cold Drawn Mild Steel (1018) | |
---|---|---|
Weldability |
|
|
UTS (Ultimate Tensile Strength) |
|
|
Elastic Modulus |
|
|
Positives |
|
|
Other Teams |
|
ASC Regulations
- Battery enclosure must be secured to the chassis
- Array needs to be attached to chassis with braided steel cable
- Safety belts need to be attached to chassis
- Needs to be designed to accommodate a minimum 5g load from all directions
- Crush zone attached to the chassis on sides of the driver
- Variety of other roll cage requirements