Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Matt - distribute the entire mass of the chassis onto the entire thing

    • allocate the additional masses and distribute to the entire chassis

Tom - time crunch?

  • run it again - same constraints - run no mass

    • if mass is not the concern, start looking at how it is constrained can be a factor

    • eliminating major factors and narrowing the potential factors

      • Idea: remove the complexities and analyze it on a simple level

    • suspect that point masses could be sources of the problem

      • test it unloaded

      • test it masses distributed across the chassis

    • simplifying your model and still missing by a wide margin, there is something potentially wrong from the fundamentals (how you sim it)

Summary of Action Items

As per shalin and matt:

  • try simulating just the chassis for the worst case orientation with no masses

    • then keep adding masses to check for exponential increase (unreasonable)

    • Shalin’s suggestion of L-shaped passenger (geometry+density =80kg)

    • distribute the additional masses of the entire vehicle across the entire chassis and see how that runs

  • make presentation and send to advisors for offline review (see unclosed items)

    • take a look at kimberly’s studies on making the bar go into the chassis with the chassis stationary

    • also take a look at doing what MSXII did for having the contact between the collision object and the chassis be frictionless

      • frictional and sliding contact; one node closes to the collision object near the centre to prevent it from sliding

Unclosed Items

Fixing the chassis and running the bar into the chassis

friction contacts

^^ weren’t able to conclude or no ground basis of justification

  • reached to that point – didn’t reach out to advisors for review

    • that is the time to bring in the advisors for review