Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Summary

Analysis and more explanations to be updated

...

Ambreen Ahmed (Unlicensed)

...

...

Status
colourGreen
titlePASS

...

This page contains the findings for conducting FEA on the centerlink.

NOTE: due to technical issues, only images of the most recent simulation are present.

Loading conditions: (from this Google Sheet) 


LOADING CASE:

Fx = -1.58 N

Fz = 113.09 N


DateMax Stress and Max DeformationNotesNext steps
 

Max stress = 55.3 MPa

Max

...

deformation = 0.8305 mm

Min Safety

...

factor = 7.95

...

Background Information 

The centerlink is used to transmit linear motion from the rack to the tie rods.

Requirements

Safety factor of at least 2. 

Loading and Boundary Conditions 

The loading condition was Fz = 113.09 N, Fx = -1.58 N.

This was found in this Google Sheet.

Image Removed

Image Removed

Results

...

Image Removed

Image Removed

Conclusion & Recommendation 

Safety Factor passes with 7.9545

...

  • FEA was not iterated as it was assumed that this part was finalized.
  • iterate to reduce safety factor; reduce wall thickness
 

Version 1: wall thickness = 1/4"

Max stress = 55.406 MPa

Max deformation = 0.83252 mm

Min safety factor = 7.94

Mesh convergence = 0.085959%


Version 2: wall thickness = 3/16"

Max stress = 83.589 MPa

Max deformation = 1.0467 mm

Min safety factor = 5.2638

Mesh convergence = 3.6415%


Version 3: side wall thickness = 1/8", top/bottom wall thickness = 3/16"

Max stress = 70.596 MPa

Max deformation = 0.89468 mm

Min safety factor = 6.2326

Mesh convergence = 0.015431%

Image Added


Image Added

Image Added

  • V1 was the same as the version of the centerlink analyzed previously (on 12/03/2019). The mesh convergence was tested.
  • V3 had less stress than V2, likely because it had a higher I.
  • Iterate further
  • Look into minimum top/bottom wall thickness. Discuss with other steering members