...
For MS16, we will continue with the typical requirements relating to battery design with extra emphasis being placed on DFA and serviceability.
Goal | Constraints & Requirements | Relevant Components | Description & Examples |
---|
Safety | (Thermal, Electrical, Mechanical) | Thermal managementModule Enclosure Cell Ensure batteries are being used Safety | Batteries should remain within safe operating limits (temperature, capacityNo overtemp, over/under voltage, overcurrent) Ensure all conducting material (current collectors, busbars) will operate within a safe temperature range Mitigate likelihood of thermal run-away and thermal runaway propagation Ensure batteries are safe from damage in crash-scenarios Ensure batteries are safe during expected drive conditions (NVH, raining/wet conditions) Ensure driver safety in crash and thermal runaway scenarios Ensure operator and battery safety during servicing
| Minimize weight | | Simplify design and do good material selection Overall MS16 weight driver safety in thermal runaway scenario Battery system should be safe from water ingress for raining & wet conditions Accidental shorts should not happen within the system
|
Mechanical Safety | Battery system should not be damaged or lead to driver harm in a crash scenario Battery system should not be damaged from expected NVH (car vibration, sudden bumps)
|
Electrical Safety | |
Performance | Weight Reduction | | Minimize power loss/redundant power consumption | | |
Minimize Power Loss & Redundant Power Consumption | Minimize power needed for cooling Minimize cell internal resistance and , connections' contact resistance, and resistance
| Minimize manufacturing & assembly time (DFM/DFA) | | |
Ensure Car Reliability by Meeting Set Timelines (Give Enough Time for Testing) | Battery manufacturing and assembly should be complete by early Winter 2026 so that testing can be complete by EOT. Spring 2026 is hands-off for mechanical, reserved for drive testing. Reduce parts, simplify design
| Minimize cost/stay within budget | | Wasn’t necessarily a problem with MS15, but based on our cell funding being $2500 this year (the lowest option available, we received $5000 for MS15), it’s important to keep budget in mind. Especially since Entire system should be designed for DFM & DFA to minimize extra work added from hiccups and to meet timeline
|
Minimize Cost/Stay Within Budget | |
Serviceability/Quality-of-Life | Thermal management Module Enclosure
| Reduce required serviceability time for module replacement and integration with mechanical & electrical systems. Reduce possible instances where catastrophic servicing mistakes can happen. (i.e. situations where you might drop something that can damage aero, situations where you might drop something that can damage hardware boards) Improve hardware accessibility for quick trouble-shooting. Aim for accessibility while operator is outside of the car. Improve ergonomics related with servicing pack & battery hardware (somewhat of a nice-to-have, but keep in mind for design wherever we can)
|
Constraints & Requirements Relating to | other subOther Sub- | teamsTeams | Everything Electrical | | ASC Regulations | |
Mechanical | |
ASC Regulations | |
...