Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Stuff we learned:

...

Nominal duty cycle of 0.23 is reasonable, so L = 240uH is reasonable!

Turns Ratio Calculation

...

Therefore, for an N:1 turns-ratio transformer, N must be less than 7.2. Conveniently, we will pick N=7, so our transformer should have a 7:1 primary to secondary turns ratio

Peak Primary Current, Ipk

...

Peak primary current is supposedly calculated using the following formula (from here):

...

Dmax = 0.5 (from above)

Vin_min = 90V (from above)

fsw = 55 kHz (from above)

Lp_max = 240uH (calculated from above)

But then why is there a 2 term in the denominator? We’re not using RMS, these are DC values

Expand
titleWhy is there a 2 in the denominator

At aroudn 7:15 in this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGZyqmAHMw0

He mentions that the Duty Cycle of 0.48 should be multiplied by 2 for some reason?? IDk

From this other source, there’s no 2 in the equation:

...

When you also try to derive the equations yourself with V = L dI/dt and tON = D*1/f, you don’t get a 2

So we will assume there is no 2 involved:

...

Ipk = 3.4A, which is very high….

Looking at the InnoSwitch datasheet, these are the rated I_limit values

...

With this in mind, we should use INN4076 (or higher) with the 4.7uF BPP configuration

Transformer Core Selection

We will semi-blindly trust the area product method shown in this video:

...

Ac is the area of the core [mm^2]

AW is the area of the winding space [mm^2]

E = max energy the inductor needs to store = 0.5*L*Ipk^2 =0.5 * 240uH * 3.4A = 1.3872 mJ

Bpk = saturation flux density of the core, which is determined by the material of the core. We will use a ferrite core (since it low losses), at which the common saturation limit is 300mT

J = current density in winding, which as a rule of thumb is given as 3A/mm for copper wire (from the video), so we will use that as well

PF = packing factor, which accounts for what percentage of the available wiring space is actually fillable by wire, since things like insulation take up space. The video estimates 50%, or 0.5, so we’ll use that too

...

Then 'A' (which is Aw*Ac) is 6200 mm^4, so we try to find a transformer where Ac (area of core) multiplied by Area of Winding (Aw) is similar

180W uses this: https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/tdk-corporation/PC95PQ32-30Z-12/9607321

60W uses this: ATQ23.7 (not on digikey)

Alternatively, let’s follow the calculations from here:

https://coefs.charlotte.edu/mnoras/files/2013/03/Transformer-and-Inductor-Design-Handbook_Chapter_13.pdf

We need these parameters:

...

Skin depth, based on their formula, is:

...

where Awire is in mm^2, so we want to pick a wire with a MINIMUM cross-sectional area of 0.25mm^2, or 0.0025cm^2, or 2.5cm^2*10^3

To verify this is correct, we use https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/tools/skin-depth-calculator/ , and see:

...

So then plug into area of circle formula:

...

We see minimum wire area is also ~0.25mm!

According to Table 4-9 in chapter 4, we the MINIMUM wire size we can use is 23-AWG

Expand
title(details....)

https://coefs.charlotte.edu/mnoras/files/2013/03/Transformer-and-Inductor-Design-Handbook_Chapter_4.pdf

image-20240210-184703.pngImage Added

Then calculate Irms, which they give as:

...

We can simplify the equation to just:

...

Then, follow their steps for determining the right transformer to use

image-20240210-185803.pngImage Addedimage-20240210-185826.pngImage Added

Assuming alpha (proportion of power loss due to copper resistance) is also their value of 1% (which is just 1 in their equation for some reason), then we find Kg = 0.0213 cm^5

...

So then go to chapter 3 of their guide, and find a core with a similar Kg (but slightly larger, just so that there’s more area to work with)

Expand

https://coefs.charlotte.edu/mnoras/files/2013/03/Transformer-and-Inductor-Design-Handbook_Chapter_3.pdf

For EE cores, nothing is within good range

image-20240211-222632.pngImage Added

Also nothing good for EC:

image-20240211-222828.pngImage Added

Nothing for ETD:

image-20240211-222843.pngImage Added

Nothing for ER:

image-20240211-222913.pngImage Added

For EFD ferrite cores, best is EFD-25 = 0.01911 or EFD-30 - 0.03047

image-20240210-191252.pngImage Added

For EPC ferrite cores, EPC-27 = 0.024036 is very close too!

image-20240211-223032.pngImage Added

For EP ferrit cores, EP-20 = 0.02892 works

image-20240211-223340.pngImage Added

For PQ ferrite cores (what they use in examples), we see PQ20/20 = 0.0227

image-20240211-224039.pngImage Added

So the ‘valid’ cores, in order of ascending Ku, are: PQ20/20, EPC-27, EP-20, EFD-30

Looked on Digikey and found the below options, then downloaded a spreadsheet format for all the valid options so it’s easier to filter and calculate stuff.

PQ20/20: https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/filter/ferrite-cores/936?s=N4IgjCBcpgDGAmKoDGUBmBDANgZwKYA0IA9lANogDMAHAJwBsNA7CALrEAOALlCAMrcATgEsAdgHMQAX2KI6EaCDSQseIqQrV6DOrHZdekAcPFTZ4FgBZkyjDgLEykSlbDNmDJBxA8%2Bg0UkZOTp6WxU1R00XEH02CwBaJCUVYQBXDWdKAFYQYjp2RIKUqHTMrQh4i1ylTigwLjrIBGyLBlsRABM%2BBLgIQz48kG4AT058PkxcNGlpIA

https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/epcos-tdk-electronics/B65875A0000R087/3914436

EPC-27: (does not exist on digikey)

EP-20: https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/filter/ferrite-cores/936?s=N4IgjCBcpgDGAmKoDGUBmBDANgZwKYA0IA9lANogDMALDVQJwCsIAusQA4AuUIAylwBOASwB2AcxABfYogYRoINJCx4ipCtTo1YsNpx6R%2BQsZJngAHAHYayJRhwFiZSJRpgrVgGxJ2IbrwCIhLSsgwWDHbKqk4ariB6rOYAtEiKykIAruoulCzEkUnEyZHpUFk5mhBJ5iyKHFBgnA2QCEzmXnbCACa8yXAQBrwgxFwAnhz4vJi4aFJSQA

https://www.tdk-electronics.tdk.com/inf/80/db/fer/ep_20.pdf

EFD-30: https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/filter/ferrite-cores/936?s=N4IgjCBcpgDGAmKoDGUBmBDANgZwKYA0IA9lANogDMALFQgKwAcIAusQA4AuUIAylwBOASwB2AcxABfYogCcEaCDSQseIqQrU6CAGwM2nHpH5CxkmeCYB2GsmUYcBYmUiUaYa9d1J2IbrwCIhLSsnJMcvYqas6abiCwbJYAtEhKKkIArhqulAbEkawpkelQWTlaEEWWBkocUGCc9ZCMlrr2wgAmvMlwEEa8IMRcAJ4c%2BLyYuGhSUkA

https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/epcos-tdk-electronics/B66423G0000X187/3914948