Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1__XgN5KwcSGN4PDO7op1BnbrN98TiNxS-JX0baDGL14/edit?usp=sharing

What is the ideal pack configuration?

Rectangle (Packing Density: 0.785)

Honeycomb (Packing Density: 0.907)

  • More space in between batteries for cooling/other equipment

  • Extra space reduces probability of combustion in event of crash

  • Higher packing density 

  • Less space taken 

  • Less materials needed

2S vs 4S Modules

  • An even number of cells in series required to keep the gusset plates on top.

Area = 0.23928 m2

PROS:

  • More gap area between modules, possibly better airflow and cooling for batteries

  • Reduced complexity per module, only one busbar connection on bottom

  • Module arrangement has positive and negative terminals on same side

  • Area in top center for hardware components

  • More modules means damage is more isolated and cheaper to fix

CONS:

  • More module to module connections, greater contact resistance and possibly greater energy loss in connections compared to 4S?

  • Have to create and assemble “double” the modules

  • Takes up more area

Image RemovedImage Added

Area = 0.22403 m2

PROS:

  • Module arrangement has positive and negative terminals on same side

  • Area in top right for hardware components

  • Only have to create “half” the number of modules

  • Less energy loss in module to module connections

CONS:

  • More complex modules, need 5 busbar connections

  • Very long (86.7 cm)

Area = 0.20163 m2

PROS:

  • Smallest area required

  • Only have to create “half” the number of modules

  • Less energy loss in module to module connections

CONS:

  • Positive and negative terminals on opposite sides.

  • More complex modules, need 5 busbar connections

Cell Arrangement

What to do with empty spaces?

kinda sus

Image AddedImage AddedImage Added