Rough Manufacturability/Aerodynamic Comparison
...
Theoretically has more panels but they would be smaller
Bottom panel can be difficult to manufacture
Possibility to have the aero body to move with dynamics (only do if got the skill/talk to dynamics)
Bullet:
Theoretically has fewer panels/molds but they would be very large
Can be made perform well in higher speeds (still have to think about manufacturability)
Can be designed to reduce crosswinds more than catamaran
Con: probably need a curve that is quite precise with little tolerance
...
Visually good airflow with turbulence slowing the flow down to 14m/s.
At 22.2m/s there was 55.526N of air resistance requiring [55.526(m^2/s)x22.2(m/s)] 1232.68 Watts of energy to maintain it’s speed.
...
More turbulence with this design
At 22.2m/s there was 107.327N of air resistance requiring [100.7(m^2/s)x22.2(m/s)] 2235.66 Watts of energy to maintain it’s speed.
...